Golden Roof ISIPTA'11 home Nordkette mountain range

Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark Schervish, Joseph Kadane


Forecasting with Imprecise Probabilities

Abstract

We review de Finetti’s two coherence criteria for determinate probabilities: coherence1 defined in terms of previsions for a set of random variables that are undominated by the status quo – previsions immune to a sure-loss – and coherence2 defined in terms of forecasts for events undominated in Brier score by a rival forecast. We propose a criterion of IP-coherence2 based on a generalization of Brier score for IP-forecasts that uses 1-sided, lower and upper, probability forecasts. However, whereas Brier score is a strictly proper scoring rule for eliciting determinate probabilities, we show that there is no real-valued strictly proper IP-score. Nonetheless, with respect to either of two decision rules – Gamma-Maximin or (Levi’s) E-admissibility + Gamma-Maximin – we give a lexicographic strictly proper IP-scoring rule that is based on Brier score.

Keywords

Brier score, coherence, dominance, E-admissibility, Gamma-Maximin, proper scoring rules.


Download area

The paper is available in the following formats:


Authors’ addresses

Teddy Seidenfeld
135J Baker Hall
Carnegie Mellon University
Pgh. PA 15213

Mark Schervish
Department of Statistics
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
USA

Joseph Kadane
Department of Statistics
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213

E-mail addresses

Teddy Seidenfeld  teddy@stat.cmu.edu
Mark Schervish  mark@stat.cmu.edu
Joseph Kadane  kadane@stat.cmu.edu

Send any remarks to isipta11@uibk.ac.at.